Waste through exhaust? Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

BNO BBS - BNO's Bulletin Board System » THE ARCHIVES » Year 2007 » August 2007 » Waste through exhaust? « Previous Next »

Author Message
RJmule (Rjmule)
Registered Member
Username: Rjmule

Post Number: 122
Registered: 2-2007
Posted From: 75.51.73.91

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, August 09, 2007 - 11:41 pm:   

I worked for a motor home company while in high school and we work exclusively on Cortez motor homes.
My question is !! Is it still legal to run your septic tank waste thru your exhaust ??? Cortez did it and it seemed to work well,except of course when you needed to replace the exhaust :-) This was legal back then and just wanted to know if it still is.
My presumption is the waste would burn up while going thru the exhaust, Sounds logical to me, RJmule Randall
Michael Sheldon (Msheldon)
Registered Member
Username: Msheldon

Post Number: 46
Registered: 10-2006
Posted From: 68.230.115.166

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 10, 2007 - 2:02 am:   

Sounds to me like a good way to slowly restrict your exhaust with burned residue.
Austin Scott Davis (Zimtok)
Registered Member
Username: Zimtok

Post Number: 159
Registered: 9-2006
Posted From: 216.37.73.226

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 10, 2007 - 9:01 am:   

I'm not sure I'd like to be following a motorhome with that set-up.

Were the Cortez Motorhomes with this feature Deisel or Gas? Seems to me that the Gas powered ones would have hotter exhaust and better at burning the waste.

.
David Dulmage (Daved)
Registered Member
Username: Daved

Post Number: 172
Registered: 12-2003
Posted From: 142.46.199.30

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 10, 2007 - 10:54 am:   

If I recall correctly, some might have been powered by the venerable Chrysler 225 c.i.d slant six.

DaveD
Pete/RTS Daytona (Pete_rtsdaytona)
Registered Member
Username: Pete_rtsdaytona

Post Number: 378
Registered: 1-2005
Posted From: 208.118.14.253

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 10, 2007 - 11:00 am:   

hi

Thermasan

source - Henry Davis (Classic GMC M/H'er)

GMC offered an option for the motor home that incinerated waste from the holding tank when conditions were right. The exhaust provided the heat and the exhaust pipe flushed the ash out the tail pipe. Click for one of Thermasan's patents that describes this system.... Thermasan was part of Thetford Industries but closed in 1980 due to the reduced demand for RVs. All of the people who knew about the Thermasan system have left the company. Thanks to folks on the GMCnet ...

also see--> http://www.henry-davis.com/GMC/thermasan.htm

http://www.amphicar.net/library/thermasan/thermasan.html

http://www.gmcgreatlakers.org/GMCGreatLakers/Technical/Livingarea/Thermasan-System/Pages79 5-800%20from%20X7425.pdf
RJmule (Rjmule)
Registered Member
Username: Rjmule

Post Number: 123
Registered: 2-2007
Posted From: 75.51.73.91

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 10, 2007 - 1:11 pm:   

THE ORIGINAL CORTEZ WERE 225 SLANT SIX THEN THEY INTRODUCED THE LARGER CHRYSLERS, THEY WERE ALL FRONT WHEEL DRIVE. THEY LATER ON PUT THE TORANADO 455 ?? IN THEM AND WHEN THE ENGINES WERE BUILT RIGHT THEY HAD SOME AWESOME POWER,THE CO I WORKED FOR PUT THE B&M TRICK SHIFT WITH B&M TRANSMISSION AND YOU COULD GET THE FRONT WHEELS TO SPIN IN 1ST GEAR :-) ALOT OF POWER FOR A 30' ALL STEEL MOTORHOME. YOU ALL HAVE A GREAT DAY !!! RJMULE
Christopher Goodwin (Cgoodwin)
Registered Member
Username: Cgoodwin

Post Number: 110
Registered: 10-2005
Posted From: 71.212.78.253

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, August 11, 2007 - 11:27 pm:   

While the idea seems disgusting at first, it is quite interesting when you read through the systems function. Since a vehicle speed of at least 35mph and an exhaust temp of 1000F are both requirements for the system to operate I can not see how anything more than steam and carbon would result. Not a system I would like to repair should a fault occure though. It seems to me that a simple pickup with a screen, a pump set to deliver 2 gallons every hour at 35 mph or 4 gallons an hour at 60mph would be all that would be required to attempt to recreate this system. The ability to incenerate 4 gallons an hour of waste could be pretty attractive....

My stock toilet already uses the waste to flush the toilet, or so it seems. There is a pump and a pickup screen in the "honey bucket" and with a little work I could rig it to "flush" into the exhaust through an restricted orifice. I suppose the connecting line would need to be Viton to handle the heat at the exhaust connection...
John MC9 (John_mc9)
Registered Member
Username: John_mc9

Post Number: 481
Registered: 7-2006
Posted From: 66.217.108.33

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, August 12, 2007 - 1:03 am:   

It's not so much the human waste, as it is the human products,
like toilet paper, that may cause havoc with the system.....

(Not to mention the occasional Tampax, that would appear
to be a poor innocent incinerated rat, to the guy behind you)

(quick, get me the number to PETA.)
RJmule (Rjmule)
Registered Member
Username: Rjmule

Post Number: 124
Registered: 2-2007
Posted From: 75.51.73.91

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, August 12, 2007 - 11:23 am:   

IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, THE BIGGEST PROBLEM WE HAD WITH THE SYSTEM WAS THE SCREEN/FILTER CLOGGING AND IT WAS NOT A FUN JOB TO FIX. BUT THE SYSTEM DID WORK GREAT, THIS IS WHY I WAS WONDERING WHY NO ONE WAS USING THEM ON THERE BUSSES. CONSIDER A 3000 MI TRIP WITH 3-5 PEOPLE IN YOUR BUS AT THE END OF THE JOURNEY YOUR TANK WAS STILL EMPTY. NOT BAD I WOULD THINK. THANKS PETE FOR THE RESOURCES. RJmule. Randall
Jim Wilke (Pd41044039)
Registered Member
Username: Pd41044039

Post Number: 162
Registered: 2-2001
Posted From: 68.187.183.190

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, August 12, 2007 - 2:54 pm:   

We had a 1978 Holiday Rambler that had this system. I say "had" because when we bought it, the system hadn't worked in some time & we didn't fix it. But there were more users than just the Cortez. I would think this system would work much better on the grey water tank anyway there's about 3 times as much grey as black water.
Kyle Brandt (Kyle4501)
Registered Member
Username: Kyle4501

Post Number: 355
Registered: 9-2004
Posted From: 65.23.106.193

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, August 13, 2007 - 10:21 am:   

I thought normal exhaust temps were in the 500 to 900 F range for diesels. Above that will reduce efficiency - or so I've heard.

I know that as the temps rise above that for an extended time, coolant temp rises above the thermostat rating (one example is a pusher 330 CAT in a freightliner chasis motor home & the other is a 575 CAT in a 2000 Peterbuilt).

Seems 1000F is not so easy to maintain & the maintence required to keep the system operating make other options more popular.

I wonder what this system would do for the EPA emissions?
Christopher Goodwin (Cgoodwin)
Registered Member
Username: Cgoodwin

Post Number: 125
Registered: 10-2005
Posted From: 71.212.70.132

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, August 19, 2007 - 10:01 pm:   

"I wonder what this system would do for the EPA emissions?"

Well Mercedes is injecting uric acid into the exhaust to lower emissions and water injection lowers NOX so the pee in the tail pipe might just help emissions considerably.

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration