12v71 in GM bus? Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

BNO BBS - BNO's Bulletin Board System » THE ARCHIVES » Year 2007 » September 2007 » 12v71 in GM bus? « Previous Next »

Author Message
quantum merlin (Quantum500)
Registered Member
Username: Quantum500

Post Number: 2
Registered: 8-2007
Posted From: 70.57.21.17

Rating: 
Votes: 1 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, August 30, 2007 - 9:36 pm:   

Anybody tried it? Can the drive train hold it? Will the extra wieght cause any problems?
James Smith (Tomcat)
Registered Member
Username: Tomcat

Post Number: 63
Registered: 8-2005
Posted From: 207.200.116.13

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, August 30, 2007 - 9:54 pm:   

If I recall correctly, some buses were built that way from the factory to run the Canadian Rockies.
At least one still out there I believe.

Jay
87 SaftLiner
Luvrbus (Luvrbus)
Registered Member
Username: Luvrbus

Post Number: 103
Registered: 8-2006
Posted From: 74.32.80.38

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, August 30, 2007 - 9:55 pm:   

I heard some Mci 6s had v12s
Laryn Christley (Barn_owl)
Registered Member
Username: Barn_owl

Post Number: 74
Registered: 10-2006
Posted From: 151.199.95.252

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, August 30, 2007 - 11:27 pm:   

A 4501 might, but it would be too long to fit transversely in the rest.
joe padberg (Joemc7ab)
Registered Member
Username: Joemc7ab

Post Number: 137
Registered: 6-2004
Posted From: 66.38.159.33

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 31, 2007 - 12:17 am:   

George Todd has / had one in his MC6. Apparently his plan is to replace it with an 8v92. My guess is that it would be fairly thirsty.

Joe.
George M. Todd (George_mc6)
Registered Member
Username: George_mc6

Post Number: 258
Registered: 8-2006
Posted From: 207.231.81.129

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 31, 2007 - 1:35 am:   

Joe is right!
All 100 MC6s were originally built with 12V71s and 4 speed sticks. Strong and fast, but they had troubles with that much power, and that much weight. So, about 80 of them were changed to 8V71s and 740 Allison on their first rebuild, in 1973. They were gutless, so they added turbos to them, which I guess helped a little. The gear ratio is so numerically low, (high speed) that they are hard on clutches, but will go over 90. There is an excellent article back in the archives about fuel economy in Detroits. IIRC, about 1700 rpm produces the best fuel mileage, and this thing gets about 8. One other thing to keep in mind is that an 8V92 produces the same power as a 12V71, with better fuel mileage, and its a foot and a half shorter! Length is the reason for my changeout, as there isn't enough room for an auto.
George
Jack Conrad (Jackconrad)
Registered Member
Username: Jackconrad

Post Number: 615
Registered: 12-2000
Posted From: 76.1.180.218

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 31, 2007 - 10:35 am:   

I know a person that had a 12V71 in an MC-7. The engine stuck out the back of the bus and the radiator was mounted behind the engine (similar to taking a complete truck engine with radiator assembly and sticking the whole thing in the MCI). He later removed it and sold it to a mine to replace a blown 12V71 that operated a rock crusher. He now has a 8-92 with similar radiator set up. Jack
quantum merlin (Quantum500)
Registered Member
Username: Quantum500

Post Number: 3
Registered: 8-2007
Posted From: 70.57.21.17

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 31, 2007 - 10:50 am:   

I think I have the size problem figured out and yes I know all about the MCI coaches that had 12v71's. I was more concerned with the extra wieght and extra power. I guess since 8v92's seem to be more popular....or easier to get a hold of. Has anybody had any troubles with the added wieght and power from one of these in a GM bus, or MCI for that matter.
Kyle Brandt (Kyle4501)
Registered Member
Username: Kyle4501

Post Number: 364
Registered: 9-2004
Posted From: 65.23.106.193

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 31, 2007 - 11:18 am:   

RE: Has anybody had any troubles with the added wieght and power from one of these in a GM bus?

YES.

GM's weren't designed for the weight or power of anything bigger than a 8V71. (some, not even that much) The Alum structure will eventually crack & fail from the stresses from the designed power train, that's why the routine garage maintainence included inspecting the whole bus for cracks so they could be repaired before total failure.
You can add reinforcement, but if you don't know what you're doing, you could be making it worse.

Can you get away with it? Sure, but for how long?

How long depends on lots of things, some of which come to mind:
Past history of bus - how many miles? how much abuse? how many chatter starts with the clutch?

Has the bulkhead been repaired? how well? how long ago?

What is the condition of the rest of the bus? where was it operated? how much corrosion is present?

A 4501 is the only GM Parlor Diesel coach that came with a T-drive. Mine has the 8V71NA & it is suprising how quickly it reaches 4th.

What's the rush? spend the $$$ on paint & slow down so everyone can admire it as they pass :-)

If you're in such a rush, why not fly? It'd be cheaper.

If it were me & I wished to remain ground based with this much power, I'd look into modifying a
cab-over into a monster class C motor home.
Douglas Wotring (Tekebird)
Registered Member
Username: Tekebird

Post Number: 239
Registered: 10-2004
Posted From: 71.230.14.180

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 31, 2007 - 11:57 am:   

Kyle watch out the people who like to do the impossible may come out and admonish you.....and tell you they can put a 12-71 in there and tow a 2000# tounge weight 15,000# trailer for decades
Kyle Brandt (Kyle4501)
Registered Member
Username: Kyle4501

Post Number: 365
Registered: 9-2004
Posted From: 65.23.106.193

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 31, 2007 - 12:37 pm:   

That's OK

Won't be the first time I've been admonished.

Won't be the first time someone was wrong.

Won't be the first time someone was lucky & got away with something that sound reasoning & design doesn't support.

I'm NOT saying it can't be done.
I AM saying there is way more to it than most think & to have LONG TERM success, one needs to consider lots of things that tend to be taken for granted. And that there are really good reasons why you won't see it done more frequently. (most people that have enough $$$ to do something like that are smart enough to have found a way to do it better & cheaper)

Buses are designed as capital equipment to be used in the generation of income & proffit for its owner while the public pay to ride in it.

Cars are designed as a commodity to be the personal property of the end consumer who uses it privately.

I find it interesting that some can't comprehend what this means in the design process.
Ron Walker (Prevost82)
Registered Member
Username: Prevost82

Post Number: 331
Registered: 11-2003
Posted From: 66.82.9.56

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 31, 2007 - 12:38 pm:   

quantum merlin ... a 8V92ta weights are about the same as a 8V71. It's a couple of inch longer.
Ron
Kyle Brandt (Kyle4501)
Registered Member
Username: Kyle4501

Post Number: 367
Registered: 9-2004
Posted From: 65.23.106.193

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 31, 2007 - 1:48 pm:   

Oh yeah, What model are you interested in putting it in? Some only came with 4-71s or 6-71s.
You are aware that the GM V-drive utilizes a left hand rotating engine. . .
Then there is the minor detail of the limited selection of transmissions - Are any of those able to handle the increased power level?
Also of note, the automatics used in the GM V-drives are notoriously bad on fuel mileage.
Another thing - COOLING - How are you gonna cool the engine? GM's aint known for excess cooling capacity.

I've done the hot rodding thing a time or two. Much less expensive to ask questions like you are doing now rather than on the side of the road with a pile of busted parts.

BTW, my first question to the boards was along the lines of "how much power can you get out of a 8V92?"
The answers included lots of information relating to the affected systems which I didnot understand at the time, but later, as I learned more, I was able to determine the posters that had the best answers & the posters that were, well, not so much.
Gus Causbie (Gusc)
Registered Member
Username: Gusc

Post Number: 475
Registered: 11-2005
Posted From: 63.97.117.54

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 31, 2007 - 2:45 pm:   

I thought about a 12V71 but have now decided to go to a 16V71 instead. I'm going to put it amidships and have an engine room just like on a tugboat.

I'll only have two gears with a giant torque converter and triple tandem rear.
Kyle Brandt (Kyle4501)
Registered Member
Username: Kyle4501

Post Number: 368
Registered: 9-2004
Posted From: 65.23.106.193

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 31, 2007 - 3:49 pm:   

Gus, What? no turbos & after coolers?
That would be a show, smoking 12 tires!

Turns would be fun :-)
Austin Scott Davis (Zimtok)
Registered Member
Username: Zimtok

Post Number: 162
Registered: 9-2006
Posted From: 216.37.73.226

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 31, 2007 - 4:00 pm:   

OOOOO,
How about a "MONSTER BUS"
With 2 of those twin turbo Allison aircraft engines.
OR
Build a Jet powered bus to run the salt flats and set a speed record.

.
J.L.Vickers (Roadrunnertex)
Registered Member
Username: Roadrunnertex

Post Number: 31
Registered: 10-2006
Posted From: 76.1.64.165

Rating: 
Votes: 1 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 31, 2007 - 4:32 pm:   

A 4501 is the only GM Parlor Diesel coach that came with a T-drive.

Well this is from the book GM Intercity Coaches.
These GMC Coaches had a "T" Drive long before the PD-4501 in 1954.
PGA-3702,PD-3302,PD-2903.PDA-3703,PDA-3704 had 4/71 Detroits.
And last but not least the one and only PD-4901 Golden Chariot.
jlv
Michael Sheldon (Msheldon)
Registered Member
Username: Msheldon

Post Number: 47
Registered: 10-2006
Posted From: 68.230.115.166

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 31, 2007 - 4:41 pm:   

Now Gus, the 12V is fine, just don't settle for a 71.
THIS is the one you want:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=120153503354
Gus Causbie (Gusc)
Registered Member
Username: Gusc

Post Number: 476
Registered: 11-2005
Posted From: 63.97.117.44

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 31, 2007 - 8:35 pm:   

Forgot to mention the twin turbos w/aftercoolers since this is two 8Vs tied together.

I thought about Allisons but they don't have the torque, these are small engines compared to this tugboat engine I'm using. Anyway, those Allisons are too expensive now because all the air racers in Reno have about used them up.

I want the 71s because they have dry sleeves and are easier to find. This one came from a Navy surplus tugboat that was in mothballs.

My big problem is finding a driveline to handle it but I think one of those old military tank hauler trucks will do it. I know where one is sitting behind a warehouse.

The front and rear tandems on these tractors steer and all three axles will drive/release by air. They also have tandem/steer fronts but I don't want them, I want to cut down on the number of tires.
Kyle Brandt (Kyle4501)
Registered Member
Username: Kyle4501

Post Number: 370
Registered: 9-2004
Posted From: 72.147.48.9

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, August 31, 2007 - 9:27 pm:   

Hey JL, Thanks for pointing that out. I should have qualified my statement to be for the 'modern era' buses from GM :-)

Gus, I've often considered making a mid-engined bus by 'simply' placing a modified bus body on a truck frame. That would enable one to haul one heck of a trailer too :-)
quantum merlin (Quantum500)
Registered Member
Username: Quantum500

Post Number: 4
Registered: 8-2007
Posted From: 71.216.90.94

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, September 01, 2007 - 1:37 am:   

I'm glad I got so much response. Realistically I would probably never have the time to do such a conversion. I do happen to have a low hour 12v71 just "sitting around" so of course you have to think about what to put it in. Some of the responses got me to looking at exact dimensions and wieghts. Interesting stuff to say the least. 8v92 wieghs about 300lbs more than an 8v71. 12v71 wieghs about 1800lbs more than an 8v71. No real shocker there. A 12v92 wieghs 600lbs less than a 12v71.....! To top it all off it is dimensonally smaller...just by a little.
marvin pack (Gomer)
Registered Member
Username: Gomer

Post Number: 86
Registered: 3-2007
Posted From: 76.4.145.234

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, September 01, 2007 - 5:27 pm:   

will any of that fit my 66-vw bus? will I have to modify MUCH? LOL
gomer
Gus Causbie (Gusc)
Registered Member
Username: Gusc

Post Number: 478
Registered: 11-2005
Posted From: 63.97.117.52

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Saturday, September 01, 2007 - 8:51 pm:   

gomer,

If you put it in the back you will have to move your battery to the front. Otherwise, I see no problem.
Kevin Black (Kblackav8or)
Registered Member
Username: Kblackav8or

Post Number: 73
Registered: 8-2005
Posted From: 24.152.174.198

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, September 03, 2007 - 8:13 pm:   

I would like to see and hear something like that. A big cam cummins will still out pull one though. They are fast and more torquey then a 8v but aren't giant killers. Want to really crush buses going up the grapevine? Cummins KT with a 10 or 15 speed OD. A Super 10 would be a nice match. Semi-automatic shifting. KT's are thirsty but less so then a 12V is. Who's gonna build the Monster Bus. Whatever happened to the guy with the 3408 bus?
ned sanders (Uncle_ned)
Registered Member
Username: Uncle_ned

Post Number: 39
Registered: 5-2005
Posted From: 68.213.111.136

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, September 04, 2007 - 10:50 am:   

I believe one of the 12v92's would be just right for my "box" my 63 econoline toad. Might have to strech the wheel base a little.Then when "huggy" had problems i could just push.

uncle ned
Gus Causbie (Gusc)
Registered Member
Username: Gusc

Post Number: 484
Registered: 11-2005
Posted From: 63.97.117.17

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, September 05, 2007 - 12:26 am:   

Ned,

You will need to move your battery to the front just like in Gomer's VW.
Tim Brandt (Timb)
Registered Member
Username: Timb

Post Number: 63
Registered: 10-2003
Posted From: 72.145.182.9

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, September 05, 2007 - 10:30 am:   

Kyle,

No need to look for a truck chasis the AFC Brill was a mid engine
Jeffrey Smith (Greenhornet)
Registered Member
Username: Greenhornet

Post Number: 58
Registered: 12-2006
Posted From: 76.110.30.60

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, September 07, 2007 - 7:45 pm:   

"Now Gus, the 12V is fine, just don't settle for a 71.
THIS is the one you want:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=120153503354"


WOW! That looks insane....I want one!

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration