MC7 - missing internal skins Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

BNO BBS - BNO's Bulletin Board System » THE ARCHIVES » Year 2008 » May 2008 » MC7 - missing internal skins « Previous Next »

Author Message
adam (Urban_hillbilly)
Registered Member
Username: Urban_hillbilly

Post Number: 8
Registered: 4-2008
Posted From: 76.22.119.223

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, April 29, 2008 - 12:13 pm:   

Right, so was looking at this 1971 MC7, I quickly found that the interior metal skin has been removed for a conversion. The boards tell me this is a fatal flaw, that skin is integral to structure (see, I'm listening) so I am walking away.

Question, is there any repairing this condition in a simple way, or is it not worth the trouble? Is there structural damage probably already done in running that coach naked? I'm finding alot of folks have done this. Are there some coaches where this is not a problem?

Thanks,
Adam Jay
Glenn Williams (Glenn)
Registered Member
Username: Glenn

Post Number: 157
Registered: 6-2006
Posted From: 216.163.57.205


Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, April 29, 2008 - 1:14 pm:   

I think you will find a lot of different opinions here. My thoughts? The framing of an MCI 7 is pretty stout, and if it has never carried a full load of people/stuff with the panels empty, it is possible that there may be no damage. How does the outside skin look? Is there any sign of damage to the thinner stainless? Do you see lots of loose rivets? Many converters remove those panels to add insulation and check for structural damage. You may have an advantage here in that you can see the frame. How far would it need to be transported to get to you? Are the panels included with the bus?

Good Luck!

Glenn
George M. Todd (George_mc6)
Registered Member
Username: George_mc6

Post Number: 424
Registered: 8-2006
Posted From: 207.231.75.253

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, April 29, 2008 - 6:12 pm:   

I agree with Glenn. Look closely at the outside where the vertical members attach to the skin. If there are no wrinkles, and the rivets haven't torn out of the skin, nothing has moved. Look closely where the diagonal braces attach at the bottom and top of the windows. If it is all still as it was, I would say its OK. If you need to drive it any distance, unload it completely first.
Regards,
George
adam (Urban_hillbilly)
Registered Member
Username: Urban_hillbilly

Post Number: 9
Registered: 4-2008
Posted From: 76.22.119.223

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 3:38 am:   

Thanks, guys! I received an email back, seller says that the side skins are still in place. I can see, though, from the pics that the ceiling skin is out and he had begun to apply what looks like insulation and plywood. I have asked for clarification, and whether or not he has the original panels still.

If he does have the panels, what would be the reapplication method. If he doesn't, what alternatives exist for restoring structural integrity?

It would travel a couple hundred miles to get it home. Haven't seen in person yet, but will check all the things you advise.

thanks,
Adam
Ed Roelle (Ed_roelle)
Registered Member
Username: Ed_roelle

Post Number: 52
Registered: 3-2005
Posted From: 68.61.133.65

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 9:53 am:   

I took my interior aluminum panels out of my X MCI 8 (probably no stronger than an MCI 7). I did add 3/8" plywood on the walls - but that is not very structural with my attachment method (drywall screws).

I had NO problems over about 40,000 miles.

Ed Roelle
Roger Dalke (Roger_d)
Registered Member
Username: Roger_d

Post Number: 9
Registered: 8-2007
Posted From: 205.206.150.56

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 11:45 am:   

My 7 has all the interior panels removed was missing a tag wheel and hub, and after a 200 mile drive, still straight as an arrow. After removing the lower trim I discovered that the bottom inch of aluminum is rotten. So IMHO these are way overbuilt.
Grant Thiessen (Busshawg)
Registered Member
Username: Busshawg

Post Number: 31
Registered: 10-2007
Posted From: 206.45.93.160

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 12:41 pm:   

I took my interiour panels out as well, sprayed in insulation and lined the bus with 5/8 plywood. I haven't driven the bus yet as it's still under construction but the thread has me concerned about the procedure I followed. I didn't realize that these panels were so structurally important. How important is it that these interiour panels are in place?
niles steckbauer (Niles500)
Registered Member
Username: Niles500

Post Number: 837
Registered: 11-2004
Posted From: 97.76.134.241

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 1:08 pm:   

http://www.busnut.com/bbs/messages/233/10526.html
Glenn Williams (Glenn)
Registered Member
Username: Glenn

Post Number: 158
Registered: 6-2006
Posted From: 216.163.57.205


Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - 3:40 pm:   

Adam,
The MCI 7 only has interior aluminum panels below the windows. Above that was the headliner wood, insulation, ribs and outer skin. Sounds like just a standard empty shell ready for conversion. If you are looking for the original ceiling panels (some sort of wood) I have a complete set except for the area where the skylights were up to the destination sign. My cap was replaced by the previous owner. If you want to pick them up in Michigan, you can have them. I've been planning on pitching them. I also have the steel strips that hold these to the ceiling ribs and the stainless trim that goes over them. Good luck!

Glenn
joe padberg (Joemc7ab)
Registered Member
Username: Joemc7ab

Post Number: 245
Registered: 6-2004
Posted From: 66.38.159.33

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, May 01, 2008 - 12:15 am:   

Adam

It may not be all bad to have the interior sideskin not in place.
It allows you to see exactly whether or not you have any rust in that area. The original insulation is usually fibreglass and likely wet.
Fred Hobe installs 5/8 round rod cross braces, which may end up making it stronger than the original configuration.
Also if any windows are going to blanked off those areas could also receive additional strenghtening, making the end result probably better than the original coach setup.
I have been told that the weight of the 7 is more than the later coaches and one veteran hound driver told me they felt more solid than later units. weightwise I think the price goes to Georges MC6.

Joe.
adam (Urban_hillbilly)
Registered Member
Username: Urban_hillbilly

Post Number: 10
Registered: 4-2008
Posted From: 76.22.119.223

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Thursday, May 01, 2008 - 4:48 am:   

Thanks, guys. Good discussion. I found out that the side skins are still there. The ceiling panels have been removed, but they were only wood originally.

Fred Hobe emailed me and said he has rutinely removed skins and improved insulation on all his conversions for 20 years. Furthermore he builds another interior panel to effect improved insulation. I suppose the added bracing mentioned above must be to restrengthen structurally. I've asked him if the originals ever go back in, I'll let you know.

Sounds like I may want take the side panels off temporarily anyway, to replace insulation. might as well check the frame while in there, look for leaks and rust.

Adam
Tony LEE (T_lee)
Registered Member
Username: T_lee

Post Number: 28
Registered: 11-2007
Posted From: 90.56.212.89

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Friday, May 02, 2008 - 12:56 pm:   

Most cautious converters release all air from the suspension and block the axles up level and then put additional packing under the body at several places to make sure nothing sags when they are removing panels and/or raising the roof.

There are three layers under the windows - the decorative panel which covers the dimple plate that distributes the AC air to the window vents and then the supposed structural panel itself. The first two layers can be removed if for no other reason than to increase the interior width by close to 1"

Also having the bus sitting still with the structural panels removed is far different to driving the bus with them missing
John MC9 (John_mc9)
Registered Member
Username: John_mc9

Post Number: 595
Registered: 7-2006
Posted From: 66.217.103.50


Rating: 
Votes: 1 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, May 06, 2008 - 2:47 am:   

I suppose I oughta' get into the fray by tossing a lemon into
the bowl of Wheaties:

These buses were engineered to have a certain amount of flex built
into each design. Like a skyscraper, a degree of flex is necessary,
if cracking of the structure is to be avoided.

So, adding too much rigid structural components can actually be
detrimental, not beneficial, to the overall scheme of things!

Ahhhh.... but then.... what engineer/designer of any bus, ever
assumed his design would have it's roof raised, or "slide-outs"
added, totally changing all the hours of engineering and safety
consideration that went into the initial design?

They built 'em to go a few million miles or more, sell 'em to us
when they've used up most of those miles..... we re-design
the things, drive 'em less than a few thousand a year, and think
we've done better than they have....

HAR!

(just food for thought)

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration