Jake Brake - Slave piston adj. Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

BNO BBS - BNO's Bulletin Board System » THE ARCHIVES » Year 2009 » September 2009 » Jake Brake - Slave piston adj. « Previous Next »

Author Message
Phil Smith (Phil_smith)
Registered Member
Username: Phil_smith

Post Number: 37
Registered: 3-2006
Posted From: 24.116.71.31

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, September 07, 2009 - 11:10 am:   

I've got an 8v-71N with N-65's and is 'A' timed. I installed a set of Jakes and they work pretty good, but my inquiring mind says-- "have I got the slave piston adjusted correctly for my 'A' timed engine?"...

Da Book calls for .059 and that's how it's set. Wondering if improved performance would result from a different setting considering the 'A-timing'

Phil
Jack Conrad (Jackconrad)
Registered Member
Username: Jackconrad

Post Number: 1158
Registered: 12-2000
Posted From: 173.127.128.53


Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, September 08, 2009 - 8:33 am:   

I have heard of a few people that set them at .055. I do not know what timing was used on their engines. I have also heard of a few that had the their Jakes set at .063 and saw an improvement when they were re-set to .059. Jack
Phil Smith (Phil_smith)
Registered Member
Username: Phil_smith

Post Number: 38
Registered: 3-2006
Posted From: 24.116.71.31

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, September 08, 2009 - 8:44 am:   

Hi Jack,
My thinking was that with adv. timing, the setting would 'have more clearance' to compensate for the time it takes for the piston to travel a little farther. But I thought I'd ask the group for an opinion.

I might experiment with different settings to see if I can detect a change in performance. I think I'll try .063 and see.

Thanks Jack.
Bill Gerrie (Bill_gerrie)
Registered Member
Username: Bill_gerrie

Post Number: 284
Registered: 3-2006
Posted From: 216.198.139.38

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, September 15, 2009 - 11:34 am:   

Phil
See if Don Fairchild will answer you. He told me to change my Jakes to .057 from .059 and the injectors to 1.484 from 1.54. I now have a great running engine and it sounds so smooth. I don't have "A" timing as I run DDEC IV on a 6V92TA which has a retarded timing for emmissions.
Bill
Phil Smith (Phil_smith)
Registered Member
Username: Phil_smith

Post Number: 39
Registered: 3-2006
Posted From: 24.116.71.31

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Tuesday, September 15, 2009 - 9:13 pm:   

Thanks Bill,

Great advice. I've read Don's posts and hold his opinion high.

Don, are you out there?

Phil
Phil Smith (Phil_smith)
Registered Member
Username: Phil_smith

Post Number: 42
Registered: 3-2006
Posted From: 24.116.71.31

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, September 20, 2009 - 1:11 pm:   

Ok, I've decided that it's not going to make a difference. I'm leaving them set at .059 and be happy :-). After lengthy research on the web, I
found no references to different timing effecting the Jakes.

On to bigger fish ! Ok, where'd leave my pole ?

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration