Prevost vs. MCI Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

BNO BBS - BNO's Bulletin Board System » THE ARCHIVES » Year 2003 » February 2003 » Prevost vs. MCI « Previous Next »

Author Message
Jason (24.107.39.46)

Rating: 
Votes: 1 (Vote!)

Posted on Sunday, February 02, 2003 - 1:12 pm:   

hello all, I was considering getting a '81 Prevost Lemirage, but what are the main differnces between that and the MCI 9? Is the prevost harder to maintain? I liked the MCI because I was familiar with is and it had no rust. Do you think I am best off staying with the MCI'? What are the steering systems of a Prevost, MCI has boost and integral, is that the same as Prevost? Thanks!
Earl-8-Ky (199.174.3.237)

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, February 03, 2003 - 10:57 am:   

The big difference that I see is the windows. When you want to put cabnets above the windows in a Prevost you will block part of the windows. You do not have this problem with a MCI. The mechanical part is no big deal. There is not that much difference in them.
Ron in SD (63.98.220.66)

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Posted on Monday, February 03, 2003 - 11:48 am:   

Jason,

I am thinking about the same options for a coach.

Where you are looking at coaches? I may have looked
at them already. What part of the country do you
live?

Here are a couple things that I have uncovered.

Both can have problems with rust but the Prevost rust
can be more easily seen. MCI tend to have rust hidden
in the walls. Prevost can have problems with the
windows leaking so you need to check the flooring.
Prevost have problems with rust in the wheel wells
(mainly the rear). MCI has rust problems under the
windows be you tend not to see it until removing the
inner skin.

The Prevost has one side radiator. MCI' have their
radiatorstors above the motor one on each side. The
Prevost has more usable space on the inside due to
this fact. MCI's have always been known to over heat.
I have not heard this problem about Prevosts.

The Prevost has a shorter turning radius and has a
lift tag that helps with the turning radius.

If you go with the MCI make sure you get a '82 or
newer. MCI did some updates on the steering that
improved the turning radius.

On the Prevost the air bags are set out further on the
axles giving greater side to side stability.

The Prevost had a true frame like a Eagle (I believe
they came from the same design house.) MCI has
stressed panel construction.

Roof raising are about the same on both coaches. On
MCI you make the cuts in the window frames. You will
need new windows. On the Prevost you make the cut
under the side windows. You can reuse the side
windows or order new sliders from Prevost.

Prevost tend to have lower mileage on them compared to
MCIs because Prevost were not used by any of the major
lines. This does not say they are in better shape.
The Prevost's were used by smaller charter lines and
service may be a issue.

Ron Leiferman
South Dakota

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration